A consequence of that state of mind was that I declined to make firm plans after the next scan, and generally avoided thinking more than a couple of months into the future. I accepted that the next scan might require me to fundamentally change my course of treatment, or signal that my demise was much more imminent. My life's planning period was telescoped into the next three months. I would not buy nonrefundable airline tickets beyond the next scan (except for Southwest, which has no change fees). I would not project hope towards distant events, such as a graduation of child, or that I might see my children marry. Instead, this day -- the current day -- was where I tried to keep my concentration.
This focus on the present had unexpected benefits. The idea of exercise for my long-term health went out the window (not that I did a lot of it before cancer). I now had a much better excuse for exercise avoidance: no amount of jogging or cardio was going to change the fact that I had terminal cancer. I was more willing to indulge in dessert (not that I needed additional prompting), since there was no evidence that drinking asparagus smoothies or eating kelp (or whatever the fad of the moment was) would in any way affect the course of my disease. I didn't have to worry about saving for retirement, or global warming, or any other long-term event. Politics became less interesting; I stopped caring about who would be elected president in 2016.
Now, however, I'm beginning to wonder if I should maintain this viewpoint. The news from last week's scan strongly suggests that my metastatic cancer is shrinking, at least for now, as a result of the experimental treatment with nivolumab. I know that these results are preliminary, and that there is no basis to predict how long these results might last. We simply don't have the data. That's why I and hundreds of others are in this clinical trial: to find out just what this drug does to people with metastatic cancer, and whether it is a temporary effect, or perhaps longer lasting.
The FDA has not approved a new drug for metastatic bladder cancer for more than 20 years. Hundreds of drugs have been tested, and none have had any proven beneficial effect. Bladder cancer is an especially tricky beast, with a number of mutations and a tenacious adaptability. I'm hoping that nivolumab might break this drought, but past experience suggests caution.
So what does that mean to my life orientation? Do I begin to lift my eyes up from my three month horizon? Do I begin to hope that I will be able to see my son graduate from high school in 14 months? Can I reasonably hope to see the college graduations of Spencer, then Kirsten, and eventually Garrett? Will I be able to share in the joys and sorrows as Garrett labors though his volunteer missionary service for our church? Do I allow myself to contemplate what if I live long enough to see all my children married? Do I permit myself to contemplate growing old with Jennifer?
For three years, I have steadfastly avoided such thoughts. I found that, if I fondled distant hopes that I was highly unlikely to witness in my mortal existence, I would be filled with sorrow. Early in the Shawshank Redemption, Red told Andy, "Hope is a dangerous thing. Hope can drive a man insane." After my mets diagnosis, I understood why holding such long-term hopes could contribute to dangerous thoughts, anger, and a loss of faith. By contrast, at the end of the movie, Andy writes to Red, "hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies." And there it is: when can hope triumph over death?
I now find myself somewhere between Red and Andy. I would like to hope that the nivolumab will prolong my life, and let me look forward to events more than three months in the future. But I am not yet willing to plunge into that dangerous whorl of hopes for my future mortality. The transition from BC (before cancer) to AC was wrenching enough. I do not yet have enough empirical basis to believe that I might be in that 5% of metastatic bladder cancer patients who make it to the five year mark, let alone far beyond that.
From time to time, the New York Times has carried a series called "Life, Interrupted" by
"in some ways the hardest part of my cancer experience began once the cancer was gone." Her realization that she could never go back the the person she was before cancer, coupled with the complications of her treatments, prompted her to wonder about her life foundations.
On Friday, Jennifer and I went to the Ft. Lauderdale LDS temple and spent some time contemplating matters of eternity. On the drive down and back, we discussed whether the news of the recent scan should alter our life plans in any way. Could we start thinking about the possibility of having many more years together, instead of anticipating my premature death? Could we reasonably think about an empty nest in two or three years, and where we might live, and what we might do? Could we think about reopening the doors behind which we had stored our ideas for growing old together? We peered into those dusty dreams, had a long and thoughtful discussion, then decided, not yet. Not yet.
I am not at the point where I can think of myself as a former cancer patient. Yet. Yet: the mere fact that I can add "yet" is a shaft of sunlight on an otherwise terminal horizon. It is hope, and it is a dangerous thing. I am not yet ready to give into that hope that I might have years, instead of months, of mortality. Yet on this Easter weekend, what better time could there be for the promise of hope: it is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption: it is sown in dishonor; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power: it is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body.
Ken,
ReplyDeleteCongratulations on your recent scans! I've been meaning to thank you for writing your blog. My father and I came across it a few weeks ago and found your story very motivating. He was diagnosed with bladder cancer in 2009 at age 57, progressed in late 2012 and has been fighting like hell ever since. Things have been tough in 2015 with multiple hospital stays, infections, the dreaded addition of another nephrostomy tube as well as the news that the doctors are running out of options. He gave up hope a few weeks ago, but your story changed his mindset. We have an appointment next week at Hopkins with Dr. Hahn in hopes to enroll in the same study you are currently enlisted. If he isn't accepted, we have a back up plan with an appointment at Duke for more options. We continue every day to look for more options. If it wasn't for your blog, I'm not sure I could have motivated him again by myself. I just wanted to sincerely thank you for helping us. If he is accepted into the trial at Hopkins it would be nice to meet you in person.
Thanks again,
Jennifer
Jennifer,
DeleteThanks for your comment. I hope your dad gets in the trial and has as good results. Dr. Hahn's clinic days are Tuesday and Thursday. I'm usually there on Tuesdays (except this week I'm off). If you or your dad want to get in touch, you can friend me through BCAN. Here's a link to my recent journal posting there where I discussed this trial: https://www.inspire.com/groups/bladder-cancer-advocacy-network/journal/nivolumab-clinical-trial-is-working-on-my-mets-bc.
Ken
Ken:
ReplyDeleteIt's so great to hear that there is even a small uptick in your health prognosis! Your thoughts of April 4, though, are spot on and very uplifting to read. The line between hope and a future and living life a day at a time is a difficult one to negotiate. Been there; done that. Hard.
Thanks for your willingness to share your life's journey.
Renee T.
Ken,
ReplyDeleteIt has been wonderful to hear about your great results with the clinical trial. Having such a rapid and significant response to this drug gives you, and us listening to your story, good reason for hope. At this point it seems like this is potentially a BC wonder drug.
I had thought that all hope was lost after hearing of the recent progression of your disease, and now like you, I am cautiously optimistic.
As to you lifting your horizons, I think this is a struggle for all cancer survivors. You know that cancer patients are in a battle for their life and so their focus is razor sharp on the task of survival. Like a solder returning home to the trivialities of “normal life”, it is a difficult adjustment once the battle is over. Like all cancer survivors, you will always be looking over your shoulder, for the next attack.
I don’t think I will ever be the same after the experience. I know for me, I refocused on what was truly important, my family first, and then my friends. I also have dealt with some survivor’s guilt, which I hope you will have the pleasure to enjoy!
I am hoping for your continued success!
Karl Schaffner