Thursday, May 30, 2013

Mets Day 413 - On disability insurance

After more than 8 months, Unum Insurance Company has finally agreed to make full payment pursuant to my disability insurance policy.  It's an income replacement policy.  The policy provides that, if due to medical reasons I am no longer able to do what I had been doing (first chair complex intellectual properly litigation), and have lost more than 20% of income as a result, Unum would pay me according to a complex formula.  If my income loss is greater than 80%, then Unum would pay the full contract amount.

I agreed with my firm that, effective January 1, 2013, I would work no more than 20-25 hours per month, and would be paid about 15% of what I had been paid in 2012 and earlier years.   That's basically enough to pay for my health insurance and various other professional expenses.  (Law firm partners must pay 100% of the cost of their health insurance; there is no employer subsidy, so it's basically the COBRA cost).  I am essentially uninsurable in the private health care market, so being able to keep on with the firm's health insurance is a good thing. 

It's been a long slog with Unum.  It took forever to get them the medical records (I eventually personally obtained virtually all of the records and sent them to Unum, keeping copies for myself), and went through three claims representatives and two supervisors, and multiple "tentative" rejections, misinterpretations, lost paperwork, and miscalculations -- none of which were ever in my favor.  What a surprise.  But I'm glad that Unum has finally ponied up.  The other insurance companies that sold me similar policies (MassMutual), agreed to pay in full relatively quickly.  Because I paid for these policies with post-tax dollars, the payments that I am now receiving are tax-free.  The policies provide that they will continue to pay to age 65, or until I die, or, if by some miracle I am cured, able to resume my profession, and meet or exceed my pre-cancer earnings.  Having this revenue stream gives me great comfort and relieves the financial pressure that otherwise would quickly become crushing.

 Somewhat to my surprise, I found that I had also bought a policy from MetLife that makes payments into a 401(k) account, since I no longer have the earnings or ability to save for my (now theoretical) retirement.  It likewise will continue to age 65.  I vaguely remember making the decisions years ago to buy disability coverage, and adding to the scope of disability coverage from time to time, but until my cancer diagnosis, I paid little attention to the details.  I didn't even realize that I had purchased four different disability income replacement policies from three different companies -- it was all handled by a single agent, who I trusted to bring me and my fellow law partners the most appropriate coverage. 

I must say that I'm no fan of insurance companies -- they seem to be eager to accept your money, but unreasonably resist paying out -- but now that I am on the beneficiary side, I'm glad that I listened to my agent over the years, bought the policies, and increased my coverage as the opportunities were presented to me.  My agent has been invaluable in prodding Unum to pay up. 

I guess that this is a testament to the benefits of disability insurance.  I'm told that the odds of suffering a career-altering disability are greater than a premature death, yet apparently life insurance is more widely purchased that income-replacement disability insurance.  I've carried and paid for these disability policies for years, just as I have carried and continue to carry a substantial amount of life insurance.  Readers who are the primary breadwinner for their families, or who would find it difficult to live on just your partner's income, consider calling your agent to review and update your insurance policies.


2 comments:

  1. Hurray for your tenacity, Ken. I remember reading somewhere that over half of claims denials -- for medical, rather than disability, though -- are overturned when the claimant appeals. You really help the cause by describing this saga and your eventual win.

    This next part is not directed to you, but since you encourage your many readers to look into the disability insurance, I thought I might put a plug in for investigating long term care (LTC) insurance, too.

    Many groups have statistics on this, but it seems that about 2/3 of people over the age of 65 will need some kind of LTC. Medicare does not pay for custodial care; that is, help with "activities of daily living," such as bathing, eating, toileting. These are needed, for example, when someone has a debilitating chronic condition, has become very fragile, or has dementia/competency issues. Medicare may pay for some tangential medical services, but it won't cover in-home care or nursing home care. Medicaid -- as we currently know it -- will pay, but only if one is eligible. Which means having no money. And Medicaid has rules in place so that someone can't just transfer assets to become eligible; there is something like a 5-year look-back on transactions to see if the LTC is something the person could have paid for him or herself. A lifetime of savings can be spent down quickly paying for this care.
    It all gets expensive (and complicated) fast.

    Caveat emptor. There are a LOT of extraordinarily useless policies out there, so anyone looking into this, be really careful to understand exactly what is covered.

    Here are a couple of links for anyone interested to start looking at the issue:
    AARP -
    http://www.aarp.org/research/ppi/ltc/
    Family Caregiver Alliance -
    http://www.caregiver.org/caregiver/jsp/content_node.jsp?nodeid=440

    So thanks, Ken for letting me use your blog to jog your readers into thinking about this. A blog jog.

    Cynthia

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Ken,
    I just have a quick question about your blog! Please email me when you get a chance.
    Susan

    susanvento@cancervictimsrights.org

    ReplyDelete

Spam comments will not be accepted for posting.